[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18052908#comment-18052908
]
Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-29787:
--------------------------------------
bq. Ah, I think I missed one point, what do we treat -0 now?
Yeah this is annoying. It seems that Yetus from GHA doesn't have a way to
communicate these -0 results. I'm not 100% certain about this though. I
consider it as part of the same TODO item to figure out how to have it report
individual +1 results.
> Run Yetus General Checks as a GitHub Action
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-29787
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29787
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: build
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.6.5, 2.5.14
>
>
> It looks like we have everything we need to start using GitHub Actions.
> Actions are run via an app (vs. our Jenkins, which uses a Personal Access
> Token). Apps have access to the checks API while PATs do not. Moving the
> static checks to an action will grant the appropriate permission.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
