[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13444933#comment-13444933
 ] 

Ian Varley commented on HBASE-5341:
-----------------------------------

Virtual knot is fine (though I'd lobby for an actual one too, for reasons of 
style). Thanks for the clarification!
                
> Push the security 0.92 profile to maven repo
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5341
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5341
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build, security
>    Affects Versions: 0.92.1, 0.94.0
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.92.3
>
>
> Hbase 0.92.0 was released with two artifacts, plain and security. The 
> security code is built with -Psecurity. There are two tarballs, but only the 
> plain jar in maven repo at repository.a.o. 
> I see no reason to do a separate artifact for the security related code, 
> since 0.92 already depends on secure Hadoop 1.0.0, and all of the security 
> related code is not loaded by default. In this issue, I propose, we merge the 
> code under /security to src/ and remove the maven profile. 
> Edit: after some discussion, and the plans for modularizing the build to 
> include a security module, we changed the issue description to push the 
> security jars in 0.92.1 to maven repo. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to