Umeshkumar9414 opened a new pull request, #8345: URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/8345
After [HBASE-16089](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16089) codel target delay was changed to 100, that is not standard for CoDel ([patch](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12813161/HBASE-16089.v3.patch)). I have changed it back. To visualize why we should have 5 target delay with 100 interval, I used the [model](https://github.com/Umeshkumar9414/hbase/blob/0056886fb540ca1cfd9035aec489a3106c47bc09/hbase-server/src/main/resources/hbase-webapps/queue-simulator/adaptive-lifo-codel-simulator.html), With target delay 100 and interval 100 we are more prone the queue being full, although CoDel will be still helpful in LIFO mode but a full queue is problem as it can cause OOM. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
