[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13467947#comment-13467947
 ] 

Alex Newman commented on HBASE-6912:
------------------------------------

Agreed, it would be unfortunate if we attempted, for instance to apply 
timestamp filters at that part of the code. 
                
> Filters are not properly applied in certain cases
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6912
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6912
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.1
>            Reporter: Alex Newman
>             Fix For: 0.94.3, 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: minimalTest.java
>
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> Create a table, load data into it. Flush the table.
> Do a scan with
> 1. Some filter which should not match the first entry in the scan
> 2. Where one specifies a family and column.
> You will notice that the first entry is returned even though it doesn't match 
> the filter.
> It looks like the when the first KeyValue of a scan in the column from the 
> point of view of the code
> HRegion.java
> {code}
> } else if (kv != null && !kv.isInternal() && filterRowKey(currentRow)) {
> {code}
> Is generated by
> {code}
> public static KeyValue createLastOnRow(final byte [] row,
> final int roffset, final int rlength, final byte [] family,
> final int foffset, final int flength, final byte [] qualifier,
> final int qoffset, final int qlength) { return new KeyValue(row, roffset, 
> rlength, family, foffset, flength, qualifier, qoffset, qlength, 
> HConstants.OLDEST_TIMESTAMP, Type.Minimum, null, 0, 0); }
> {code}
> So it is always internal from that point of the code.
> Only later from within
> StoreScanner.java
> {code}
> public synchronized boolean next(List<KeyValue> outResult, int limit, String 
> metric) throws IOException {
> ....
> LOOP: while((kv = this.heap.peek()) != null) {
> {code}
> ( The second time through)
> Do we get the actual kv, with a proper type and timestamp. This seems to mess 
> with filtering.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to