[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13472127#comment-13472127
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-6929:
--------------------------------------

bq. If these are simple pom fixes and some reflection here and there I am all 
for it. If we have backport the Hadoop-2 module. Forget it
Agreed. We should identify the changes, and only backport if they are not 
intrusive. 
bq. Wondering if a snapshot would do?
I think that would do for now.

                
> Publish Hbase 0.94 artifacts build against hadoop-2.0
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6929
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6929
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: build
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.2
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>
> Downstream projects (flume, hive, pig, etc) depends on hbase, but since the 
> hbase binaries build with hadoop-2.0 are not pushed to maven, they cannot 
> depend on them. AFAIK, hadoop 1 and 2 are not binary compatible, so we should 
> also push hbase jars build with hadoop2.0 profile into maven, possibly with 
> version string like 0.94.2-hadoop2.0. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to