[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13475504#comment-13475504
 ] 

Jimmy Xiang commented on HBASE-6858:
------------------------------------

That's an interesting idea.  Probably it is out of scope of this jira.  For 
this jira, I think we should make sure recoverable zk behaves the same way as 
the previous zk: if the version is not expected, throws badversion exception, 
no matter the data is the same or not.
                
> Fix the incorrect BADVERSION checking in the recoverable zookeeper
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6858
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6858
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Zookeeper
>            Reporter: Liyin Tang
>            Assignee: Liyin Tang
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-6858.patch, HBASE-6858_v2.patch, 
> HBASE-6858_v3.patch, trunk-6858.patch, trunk-6858_v2.patch, 
> trunk-6858_v3.patch
>
>
> Thanks for Stack and Kaka's reporting that there is a bug in the recoverable 
> zookeeper when handling BADVERSION exception for setData(). It shall compare 
> the ID payload of the data in zk with its own identifier.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to