[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13479058#comment-13479058
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6389:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12549692/HBASE-6389_trunk_v2.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 15 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:red}-1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool appears to have generated
82 warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 1 new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3076//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3076//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3076//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3076//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3076//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3076//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3076//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Modify the conditions to ensure that Master waits for sufficient number of
> Region Servers before starting region assignments
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: master
> Affects Versions: 0.94.0, 0.96.0
> Reporter: Aditya Kishore
> Assignee: Aditya Kishore
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-6389_trunk.patch, HBASE-6389_trunk.patch,
> HBASE-6389_trunk.patch, HBASE-6389_trunk_v2.patch,
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestZooKeeper-output.txt, testReplication.jstack
>
>
> Continuing from HBASE-6375.
> It seems I was mistaken in my assumption that changing the value of
> "hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart" to a sufficient number (from
> default of 1) can help prevent assignment of all regions to one (or a small
> number of) region server(s).
> While this was the case in 0.90.x and 0.92.x, the behavior has changed in
> 0.94.0 onwards to address HBASE-4993.
> From 0.94.0 onwards, Master will proceed immediately after the timeout has
> lapsed, even if "hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart" has not
> reached.
> Reading the current conditions of waitForRegionServers() clarifies it
> {code:title=ServerManager.java (trunk rev:1360470)}
> ....
> 581 /**
> 582 * Wait for the region servers to report in.
> 583 * We will wait until one of this condition is met:
> 584 * - the master is stopped
> 585 * - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.timeout' is reached
> 586 * - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.maxtostart' number of
> 587 * region servers is reached
> 588 * - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart' is reached
> AND
> 589 * there have been no new region server in for
> 590 * 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.interval' time
> 591 *
> 592 * @throws InterruptedException
> 593 */
> 594 public void waitForRegionServers(MonitoredTask status)
> 595 throws InterruptedException {
> ....
> ....
> 612 while (
> 613 !this.master.isStopped() &&
> 614 slept < timeout &&
> 615 count < maxToStart &&
> 616 (lastCountChange+interval > now || count < minToStart)
> 617 ){
> ....
> {code}
> So with the current conditions, the wait will end as soon as timeout is
> reached even lesser number of RS have checked-in with the Master and the
> master will proceed with the region assignment among these RSes alone.
> As mentioned in
> -[HBASE-4993|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4993?focusedCommentId=13237196#comment-13237196]-,
> and I concur, this could have disastrous effect in large cluster especially
> now that MSLAB is turned on.
> To enforce the required quorum as specified by
> "hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart" irrespective of timeout,
> these conditions need to be modified as following
> {code:title=ServerManager.java}
> ..
> /**
> * Wait for the region servers to report in.
> * We will wait until one of this condition is met:
> * - the master is stopped
> * - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.maxtostart' number of
> * region servers is reached
> * - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart' is reached AND
> * there have been no new region server in for
> * 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.interval' time AND
> * the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.timeout' is reached
> *
> * @throws InterruptedException
> */
> public void waitForRegionServers(MonitoredTask status)
> ..
> ..
> int minToStart = this.master.getConfiguration().
> getInt("hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart", 1);
> int maxToStart = this.master.getConfiguration().
> getInt("hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.maxtostart",
> Integer.MAX_VALUE);
> if (maxToStart < minToStart) {
> maxToStart = minToStart;
> }
> ..
> ..
> while (
> !this.master.isStopped() &&
> count < maxToStart &&
> (lastCountChange+interval > now || timeout > slept || count <
> minToStart)
> ){
> ..
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
