[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13493405#comment-13493405 ]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-7055: ----------------------------------------- I didn't do any targeted testing, just general run on one box (w/ multiple RS-es). Not sure about the interplay with dynamic config, I'd assume if you mine data for table R/W patterns, take it offline and apply config once you'd be good for a long time w/better compactions. Cannot tell how much tweaking is normal w/o running it in production for a long time. If we make column config specific to columns, maybe it can be refreshed separately from dynamic config JIRA xml file refresh. I haven't looked at the column config code yet. Will create separate JIRA when I do, unless someone does earlier. > port HBASE-6371 tier-based compaction from 0.89-fb to trunk > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-7055 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7055 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Task > Components: Compaction > Affects Versions: 0.96.0 > Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin > Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin > Fix For: 0.96.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-6371-squashed.patch, HBASE-6371-v2-squashed.patch, > HBASE-6371-v3-refactor-only-squashed.patch, > HBASE-6371-v4-refactor-only-squashed.patch, > HBASE-6371-v5-refactor-only-squashed.patch > > > There's divergence in the code :( > See HBASE-6371 for details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira