[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13529218#comment-13529218
 ] 

Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-6466:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Yeah, we don't make use of these flush markers.
Created HBASE-7329 to remove.

{quote}
bq.    ... with lock held between start and complete entries. If this lock is 
kept exclusive, it will cause flush threads to serialize on it.
{quote}
bq. Ok. Were you able to make this happen Sergey?
I took the patch with locks already fixed. I can try but it seems there's 
already consensus on this :)
bq. On jds' concern, its this one: 'Also if this patch doesn't modify the 
behavior of HLog.startCacheFlush and HLog.completeCacheFlush WRT the 
cacheFlushLock I can't see how it could make things any faster.'
bq. So, your reentrant lock is how you address his concern?
Yeah, I think this locking was meant by the comment.
bq. Any guards against us flushing same memstore concurrently: i.e. we are 
already flushing it and we start in flushing it again in a concurrent thread?
There's code in flushcache that prevents this via writestate:
{code}
      synchronized (writestate) {
        if (!writestate.flushing && writestate.writesEnabled) {
          this.writestate.flushing = true;
        } else {
{code}
close calls internal flush directly but it also sets writesEnabled to false.
                
> Enable multi-thread for memstore flush
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6466
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6466
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: chunhui shen
>            Assignee: chunhui shen
>         Attachments: HBASE-6466.patch, HBASE-6466v2.patch, 
> HBASE-6466v3.1.patch, HBASE-6466v3.patch, HBASE-6466-v4.patch
>
>
> If the KV is large or Hlog is closed with high-pressure putting, we found 
> memstore is often above the high water mark and block the putting.
> So should we enable multi-thread for Memstore Flush?
> Some performance test data for reference,
> 1.test environment : 
> random writting;upper memstore limit 5.6GB;lower memstore limit 4.8GB;400 
> regions per regionserver;row len=50 bytes, value len=1024 bytes;5 
> regionserver, 300 ipc handler per regionserver;5 client, 50 thread handler 
> per client for writing
> 2.test results:
> one cacheFlush handler, tps: 7.8k/s per regionserver, Flush:10.1MB/s per 
> regionserver, appears many aboveGlobalMemstoreLimit blocking
> two cacheFlush handlers, tps: 10.7k/s per regionserver, Flush:12.46MB/s per 
> regionserver,
> 200 thread handler per client & two cacheFlush handlers, tps:16.1k/s per 
> regionserver, Flush:18.6MB/s per regionserver

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to