[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531690#comment-13531690
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5979:
--------------------------------------

Can we use a scan's cacheBlocks flag as an indicator for whether it would 
benefit from its own input stream? Presumably only large scans would have 
caching disabled.

HBASE-7336 has a simple adhoc fix for the truly terrible read performance when 
two long running scanners scan the same store file.

                
> Non-pread DFSInputStreams should be associated with scanners, not 
> HFile.Readers
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5979
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5979
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Performance, regionserver
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>
> Currently, every HFile.Reader has a single DFSInputStream, which it uses to 
> service all gets and scans. For gets, we use the positional read API (aka 
> "pread") and for scans we use a synchronized block to seek, then read. The 
> advantage of pread is that it doesn't hold any locks, so multiple gets can 
> proceed at the same time. The advantage of seek+read for scans is that the 
> datanode starts to send the entire rest of the HDFS block, rather than just 
> the single hfile block necessary. So, in a single thread, pread is faster for 
> gets, and seek+read is faster for scans since you get a strong pipelining 
> effect.
> However, in a multi-threaded case where there are multiple scans (including 
> scans which are actually part of compactions), the seek+read strategy falls 
> apart, since only one scanner may be reading at a time. Additionally, a large 
> amount of wasted IO is generated on the datanode side, and we get none of the 
> earlier-mentioned advantages.
> In one test, I switched scans to always use pread, and saw a 5x improvement 
> in throughput of the YCSB scan-only workload, since it previously was 
> completely blocked by contention on the DFSIS lock.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to