[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13535026#comment-13535026
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-7367:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12561506/HBASE-7367-v2.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 9 new
or modified tests.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3586//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Snapshot coprocessor and ACL security
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7367
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7367
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Client, master, regionserver, snapshots, Zookeeper
> Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi
> Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: hbase-6055, 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-7367-v0.patch, HBASE-7367-v1.patch,
> HBASE-7367-v2.patch
>
>
> Currently snapshot don't care about ACL...
> and in the first draft snapshots should be disabled if the ACL coprocessor is
> enabled.
> After the first step, we can discuss how to handle the snapshot/restore/clone.
> Is saving and restoring the _acl_ related rights, the right way? maybe after
> 3 months we don't want to give the access the guys listed in the old _acl_...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
