[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13560384#comment-13560384
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6832:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12566084/hbase-6832_v5-trunk.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 18 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 findbugs{color}.  The patch appears to introduce 3 new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestHLog

     {color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}.  There are 1 zombie test(s): 

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4140//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> [WINDOWS] Tests should use explicit timestamp for Puts, and not rely on 
> implicit RS timing  
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6832
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6832
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.3, 0.96.0
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>              Labels: windows
>         Attachments: hbase-6832_v1-0.94.patch, hbase-6832_v1-trunk.patch, 
> hbase-6832_v4-0.94.patch, hbase-6832_v4-trunk.patch, hbase-6832_v5-trunk.patch
>
>
> TestRegionObserverBypass.testMulti() fails with 
> {code}
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
>       at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:456)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverBypass.checkRowAndDelete(TestRegionObserverBypass.java:173)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverBypass.testMulti(TestRegionObserverBypass.java:166)
> {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to