[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13567197#comment-13567197
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-6825:
-------------------------------

Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #3829 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/3829/])
    HBASE-6825. [WINDOWS] Java NIO socket channels does not work with Windows 
ipv6 (Revision 1440679)

     Result = FAILURE
enis : 
Files : 
* 
/hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TestIPv6NIOServerSocketChannel.java
* /hbase/trunk/pom.xml

                
> [WINDOWS] Java NIO socket channels does not work with Windows ipv6
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6825
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6825
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.3, 0.96.0
>         Environment: JDK6 on windows for ipv6. 
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: hbase-6825_v3-0.94.patch, hbase-6825_v3-trunk.patch, 
> hbase-6825_v4-trunk.patch, hbase-6825_v5-trunk.patch
>
>
> While running the test TestAdmin.testCheckHBaseAvailableClosesConnection(), I 
> noticed that it takes very long, since it sleeps for 2sec * 500, because of 
> zookeeper retries. 
> The root cause of the problem is that ZK uses Java NIO to create 
> ServerSorcket's from ServerSocketChannels. Under windows, the ipv4 and ipv6 
> is implemented independently, and Java seems that it cannot reuse the same 
> socket channel for both ipv4 and ipv6 sockets. We are getting 
> "java.net.SocketException: Address family not supported by protocol
> family" exceptions. When, ZK client resolves "localhost", it gets both v4 
> 127.0.0.1 and v6 ::1 address, but the socket channel cannot bind to both v4 
> and v6. 
> The problem is reported as:
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6230761
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1357091/binding-an-ipv6-server-socket-on-windows
> Although the JDK bug is reported as resolved, I have tested with jdk1.6.0_33 
> without any success. Although JDK7 seems to have fixed this problem. In ZK, 
> we can replace the ClientCnxnSocket implementation from ClientCnxnSocketNIO 
> to a non-NIO one, but I am not sure that would be the way to go.
> Disabling ipv6 resolution of "localhost" is one other approach. I'll test it 
> to see whether it will be any good. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to