[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13585950#comment-13585950
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6469:
----------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12570795/HBASE-6469_2.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4527//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Failure on enable/disable table will cause table state in zk to be left as 
> enabling/disabling until master is restarted
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6469
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6469
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.2, 0.96.0
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: rajeshbabu
>             Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.6
>
>         Attachments: 6469-expose-force-r3.patch, HBASE-6469_2.patch, 
> HBASE-6469.patch
>
>
> In Enable/DisableTableHandler code, if something goes wrong in handling, the 
> table state in zk is left as ENABLING / DISABLING. After that we cannot force 
> any more action from the API or CLI, and the only recovery path is restarting 
> the master. 
> {code}
>     if (done) {
>       // Flip the table to enabled.
>       this.assignmentManager.getZKTable().setEnabledTable(
>         this.tableNameStr);
>       LOG.info("Table '" + this.tableNameStr
>       + "' was successfully enabled. Status: done=" + done);
>     } else {
>       LOG.warn("Table '" + this.tableNameStr
>       + "' wasn't successfully enabled. Status: done=" + done);
>     }
> {code}
> Here, if done is false, the table state is not changed. There is also no way 
> to set skipTableStateCheck from cli / api. 
> We have run into this issue a couple of times before. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to