[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13609193#comment-13609193
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7878:
-------------------------------

Do we need to use Set for processedLogs and corruptedLogs ?
Each log would be either in processed or corrupted state. I think there 
wouldn't be duplicate entry in the List representation.

bq. that the juliet HLog creation should have failed the split right?
As I said above, that didn't happen due to check for orphan hlog missing the 
juliet HLog.

bq. I see that though the patch was simple now this JIRA is more of testcase 
correction.
I think my patch exposed different behavior in tests (w.r.t. 
ZombieNewLogWriterRegionServer) due to timing.
I am quite certain that patch v14 would make tests consistently pass.
                
> recoverFileLease does not check return value of recoverLease
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7878
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7878
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: util
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.0, 0.94.6
>            Reporter: Eric Newton
>            Assignee: Ted Yu
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.95.0, 0.98.0, 0.94.7
>
>         Attachments: 7878.94, 7878-94.addendum, 7878-94.addendum2, 
> 7878-trunk.addendum, 7878-trunk.addendum2, 7878-trunk-v10.txt, 
> 7878-trunk-v11-test.txt, 7878-trunk-v12.txt, 7878-trunk-v13.txt, 
> 7878-trunk-v14.txt, 7878-trunk-v15.patch, 7878-trunk-v2.txt, 
> 7878-trunk-v3.txt, 7878-trunk-v4.txt, 7878-trunk-v5.txt, 7878-trunk-v6.txt, 
> 7878-trunk-v7.txt, 7878-trunk-v8.txt, 7878-trunk-v9.txt, 7878-trunk-v9.txt
>
>
> I think this is a problem, so I'm opening a ticket so an HBase person takes a 
> look.
> Apache Accumulo has moved its write-ahead log to HDFS. I modeled the lease 
> recovery for Accumulo after HBase's lease recovery.  During testing, we 
> experienced data loss.  I found it is necessary to wait until recoverLease 
> returns true to know that the file has been truly closed.  In FSHDFSUtils, 
> the return result of recoverLease is not checked. In the unit tests created 
> to check lease recovery in HBASE-2645, the return result of recoverLease is 
> always checked.
> I think FSHDFSUtils should be modified to check the return result, and wait 
> until it returns true.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to