[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13620663#comment-13620663
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5583:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12576723/HBASE-5583_new_1_review.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 6 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 
2.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces lines longer than 
100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestAssignmentManager
                  
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5112//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Master restart on create table with splitkeys does not recreate table with 
> all the splitkey regions
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5583
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5583
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>             Fix For: 0.95.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-5583_new_1.patch, HBASE-5583_new_1_review.patch, 
> HBASE-5583_new_2.patch, HBASE-5583_new_4_WIP.patch, 
> HBASE-5583_new_5_WIP_using_tableznode.patch
>
>
> -> Create table using splitkeys
> -> MAster goes down before all regions are added to meta
> -> On master restart the table is again enabled but with less number of 
> regions than specified in splitkeys
> Anyway client will get an exception if i had called sync create table.  But 
> table exists or not check will say table exists. 
> Is this scenario to be handled by client only or can we have some mechanism 
> on the master side for this? Pls suggest.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to