[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sergey Shelukhin updated HBASE-8340:
------------------------------------

    Summary: WAL compression handling of seeks seems to be either inefficient 
or incorrect  (was: WAL log compression handling of seeks seems to be either 
inefficient or incorrect)
    
> WAL compression handling of seeks seems to be either inefficient or incorrect
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8340
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8340
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>
> In next(...):
> {code}
>     if (compressionContext != null && emptyCompressionContext) {
>       emptyCompressionContext = false;
>     }
>     return ...
> {code}
>  
> In seek()
> {code}
>     if (compressionContext != null && emptyCompressionContext) {
>       while (next() != null) {
>         if (getPosition() == pos) {
>           emptyCompressionContext = false;
>           break;
>         }
>       }
> ...
> reader.seek(pos);
> {code}
> So, seek will seek the file directly if either any next, or any seek, has 
> been called before.
> I am not sure what this code is for, but my best guess is that it is to 
> populate the dictionary for compression.
> If it is so, it would seem that one next() call (or even one seek() call) 
> would not be enough, and seek must always use next(), otherwise it is 
> incorrect.
> If we assume that one next() is enough to be able to use reader.seek, as the 
> current code would seem to imply, then there's no need for the first seek to 
> call next() in a loop - it can call next once and then do reader.seek.
> Note: even in case if all of this works fine because external usage creates 
> the object and does one seek before any next-s, and no seeks after (the only 
> bug-free pattern currently possible with both methods used if I'm not 
> mistaken), then the code needs to be tightened and bug potential removed.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to