[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Purtell resolved HBASE-8721.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

bq. It is unlikely that this will be changed as you have to a find committers 
to +1 this. All we got up to this points are a -1 unless it is configurable and 
a couple of -0s.

Agreed, resolved as WONTFIX.

Interested parties are encouraged to go to the followups HBASE-8763 and 
HBASE-8770
                
> Deletes can mask puts that happen after the delete
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8721
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8721
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: Feng Honghua
>         Attachments: HBASE-8721-0.94-V0.patch
>
>
> this fix aims for bug mentioned in http://hbase.apache.org/book.html 5.8.2.1:
> "Deletes mask puts, even puts that happened after the delete was entered. 
> Remember that a delete writes a tombstone, which only disappears after then 
> next major compaction has run. Suppose you do a delete of everything <= T. 
> After this you do a new put with a timestamp <= T. This put, even if it 
> happened after the delete, will be masked by the delete tombstone. Performing 
> the put will not fail, but when you do a get you will notice the put did have 
> no effect. It will start working again after the major compaction has run. 
> These issues should not be a problem if you use always-increasing versions 
> for new puts to a row. But they can occur even if you do not care about time: 
> just do delete and put immediately after each other, and there is some chance 
> they happen within the same millisecond."

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to