[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16496728#comment-16496728
]
Jesus Camacho Rodriguez commented on HIVE-19586:
------------------------------------------------
There seems to be a history of failures due to flakiness with TestSSL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=%20(%20summary%20~%20%22TestSSL%22%20or%20description%20~%20%22TestSSL%22%20or%20description%20~%20%22TestSSL.q%22%20)%0Aand%20project%20%3D%20hive%20order%20by%20updated%20desc
One of the tests within TestSSL is already disabled as part of HIVE-19509
(testSSLFetchHttp). I think it should be OK to disable TestSSL and explore why
the test is failing intermittently in a new issue. [~prasanth_j], other
thoughts?
> Optimize Count(distinct X) pushdown based on the storage capabilities
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-19586
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19586
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Druid integration, Logical Optimizer
> Reporter: slim bouguerra
> Assignee: slim bouguerra
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HIVE-19586.2.patch, HIVE-19586.3.patch,
> HIVE-19586.3.patch, HIVE-19586.4.patch, HIVE-19586.5.patch,
> HIVE-19586.6.patch, HIVE-19586.patch
>
>
> h1. Goal
> Provide a way to rewrite queries with combination of COUNT(Distinct) and
> Aggregates like SUM as a series of Group By.
> This can be useful to push down to Druid queries like
> {code}
> select count(DISTINCT interval_marker), count (distinct dim), sum(num_l)
> FROM druid_test_table GROUP BY `__time`, `zone` ;
> {code}
> In general this can be useful to be used in cases where storage handlers can
> not perform count (distinct column)
> h1. How to do it.
> Use the Calcite rule {code}
> org.apache.calcite.rel.rules.AggregateExpandDistinctAggregatesRule{code} that
> breaks down Count distinct to a single Group by with Grouping sets or
> multiple series of Group by that might be linked with Joins if multiple
> counts are present.
> FYI today Hive does have a similar rule {code}
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.optimizer.calcite.rules.HiveExpandDistinctAggregatesRule{code},
> but it only provides a rewrite to Grouping sets based plan.
> I am planing to use the actual Calcite rule, [~ashutoshc] any concerns or
> caveats to be aware of?
> h2. Concerns/questions
> Need to have a way to switch between Grouping sets or Simple chained group by
> based on the plan cost. For instance for Druid based scan it makes always
> sense (at least today) to push down a series of Group by and stitch result
> sets in Hive later (as oppose to scan everything).
> But this might be not true for other storage handler that can handle Grouping
> sets it is better to push down the Grouping sets as one table scan.
> Am still unsure how i can lean on the cost optimizer to select the best plan,
> [~ashutoshc]/[~jcamachorodriguez] any inputs?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
