[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16539077#comment-16539077
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-20069:
--------------------------------



Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12931021/HIVE-20069.02.patch

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 due to 2 test(s) being added or modified.

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 due to 14639 tests passed

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/12514/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/12514/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-12514/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.PrepPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.YetusPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ExecutionPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ReportingPhase
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 12931021 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build

> Fix reoptimization in case of DPP and Semijoin optimization
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-20069
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20069
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Query Planning
>            Reporter: Zoltan Haindrich
>            Assignee: Zoltan Haindrich
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HIVE-20069.01.patch, HIVE-20069.02.patch, 
> HIVE-20069.02.patch, HIVE-20069.02.patch, HIVE-20069.02.patch
>
>
> reported by [~t3rmin4t0r]
> In case dynamic partition pruning; the operator statistics became partial; to 
> only reflect the actually scanned partitions; but they are being used as an 
> information about the "full" table...which leads to the exchange of the 2 
> tables being joined...which is really unfortunate...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to