[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16669573#comment-16669573
 ] 

mahesh kumar behera edited comment on HIVE-20682 at 10/31/18 4:02 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[~sankarh]  [~pvary]  [~thejas]  [~daijy]

I have concerned for the reference count design as 
1.  It will break the current usage pattern where we don't bother to close the 
old hive object and any code any where can call hive.get without bothering 
about leak. The only place close has to be called is during thread exit.
2. Even with reference count , we can not allow closure of session hive object 
without proper synchronization control.

i think there are two constrains within which we have to do the code change 
1. If session hive config is changed, then session hive object should also be 
reset.
2. The session hive object is shared by async threads, so some synchronization 
control has to be added if the session hive object is changed.

 isFastCheck behavior should not be changed as i feel it is supposed to be like 
that. We just have to be cautious while using get with isFastCheck set to true. 




was (Author: maheshk114):
[~sankarh]  [~pvary]  [~thejas]  [~daijy]

I have concerned for the reference count design as 
1.  It will break the current usage pattern where we don't bother to close the 
old hive object and any code any where can call hive.get without bothering 
about leak. The only place close has to be called is during thread exit.
2. Even with reference count , we can not allow closure of session hive object 
without proper synchronization control.

i think there are two constrains within which we have to do the code change 
1. If session hive config is changed, then session hive object should also be 
reset.
2. The session hive object is shared by async threads, so some synchronization 
control has to be added if the session hive object is changed.

 isFastCheck behavior should not be changed as i feel it is supposed to be like 
that. We just have to be cautious when to use get with isFastCheck set to true. 



> Async query execution can potentially fail if shared sessionHive is closed by 
> master thread.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-20682
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20682
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HiveServer2
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Sankar Hariappan
>            Assignee: Sankar Hariappan
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HIVE-20682.01.patch, HIVE-20682.02.patch, 
> HIVE-20682.03.patch, HIVE-20682.04.patch
>
>
> *Problem description:*
> The master thread initializes the *sessionHive* object in *HiveSessionImpl* 
> class when we open a new session for a client connection and by default all 
> queries from this connection shares the same sessionHive object. 
> If the master thread executes a *synchronous* query, it closes the 
> sessionHive object (referred via thread local hiveDb) if  
> {{Hive.isCompatible}} returns false and sets new Hive object in thread local 
> HiveDb but doesn't change the sessionHive object in the session. Whereas, 
> *asynchronous* query execution via async threads never closes the sessionHive 
> object and it just creates a new one if needed and sets it as their thread 
> local hiveDb.
> So, the problem can happen in the case where an *asynchronous* query is being 
> executed by async threads refers to sessionHive object and the master thread 
> receives a *synchronous* query that closes the same sessionHive object. 
> Also, each query execution overwrites the thread local hiveDb object to 
> sessionHive object which potentially leaks a metastore connection if the 
> previous synchronous query execution re-created the Hive object.
> *Possible Fix:*
> The *sessionHive* object could be shared my multiple threads and so it 
> shouldn't be allowed to be closed by any query execution threads when they 
> re-create the Hive object due to changes in Hive configurations. But the Hive 
> objects created by query execution threads should be closed when the thread 
> exits.
> So, it is proposed to have an *isAllowClose* flag (default: *true*) in Hive 
> object which should be set to *false* for *sessionHive* and would be 
> forcefully closed when the session is closed or released.
> cc [~pvary]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to