[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17040175#comment-17040175
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-22906:
--------------------------------



Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12993795/HIVE-22906.1.patch

{color:red}ERROR:{color} -1 due to no test(s) being added or modified.

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} +1 due to 18026 tests passed

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/20730/testReport
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HIVE-Build/20730/console
Test logs: http://104.198.109.242/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-20730/

Messages:
{noformat}
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.TestCheckPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.PrepPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.YetusPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ExecutionPhase
Executing org.apache.hive.ptest.execution.ReportingPhase
{noformat}

This message is automatically generated.

ATTACHMENT ID: 12993795 - PreCommit-HIVE-Build

> Redundant checkLock Mutex blocks concurrent Lock requests
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-22906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-22906
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Locking
>            Reporter: Denys Kuzmenko
>            Assignee: Denys Kuzmenko
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HIVE-22906.1.patch
>
>
> enqueueLocks is already serialising locks creation via (SELECT NL_NEXT FROM 
> NEXT_LOCK_ID FOR UPDATE). Requested locks would be assigned 'W' state.
> checkLock is iterating over the sorted set of conflicting locks below current 
> EXT_LOCK_ID. It does handle the situation when there is conflicting lock with 
> lower ID in 'W' state - lock request would be denied and retried later.   



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to