[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17143101#comment-17143101
 ] 

Ratandeep Ratti edited comment on HIVE-12679 at 6/23/20, 4:45 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

What is missing in this patch to get it committed ? Maybe we can fill in the 
gaps


was (Author: rdsr):
What is missing in this patch? Maybe we can fill in the gaps

> Allow users to be able to specify an implementation of IMetaStoreClient via 
> HiveConf
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-12679
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12679
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Configuration, Metastore, Query Planning
>            Reporter: Austin Lee
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: metastore
>         Attachments: HIVE-12679.1.patch, HIVE-12679.2.patch, 
> HIVE-12679.branch-1.2.patch, HIVE-12679.branch-2.3.patch, HIVE-12679.patch
>
>
> Hi,
> I would like to propose a change that would make it possible for users to 
> choose an implementation of IMetaStoreClient via HiveConf, i.e. 
> hive-site.xml.  Currently, in Hive the choice is hard coded to be 
> SessionHiveMetaStoreClient in org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.Hive.  There 
> is no other direct reference to SessionHiveMetaStoreClient other than the 
> hard coded class name in Hive.java and the QL component operates only on the 
> IMetaStoreClient interface so the change would be minimal and it would be 
> quite similar to how an implementation of RawStore is specified and loaded in 
> hive-metastore.  One use case this change would serve would be one where a 
> user wishes to use an implementation of this interface without the dependency 
> on the Thrift server.
>   
> Thank you,
> Austin



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to