[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21611?focusedWorklogId=465026&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-465026 ]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-21611: ----------------------------------------- Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 31/Jul/20 13:29 Start Date: 31/Jul/20 13:29 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: belugabehr commented on a change in pull request #1334: URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/1334#discussion_r463610831 ########## File path: hcatalog/webhcat/svr/src/main/java/org/apache/hive/hcatalog/templeton/tool/HDFSCleanup.java ########## @@ -113,8 +112,7 @@ public void run() { } long sleepMillis = (long) (Math.random() * interval); - LOG.info("Next execution: " + new Date(new Date().getTime() - + sleepMillis)); + LOG.info("Next execution: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() + sleepMillis)); Review comment: This changes the behavior because it previously would print a DATE, now it's just printing a number. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org Issue Time Tracking ------------------- Worklog Id: (was: 465026) Time Spent: 1h (was: 50m) > Date.getTime() can be changed to System.currentTimeMillis() > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HIVE-21611 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-21611 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: bd2019us > Assignee: Hunter Logan > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Attachments: 1.patch > > Time Spent: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Hello, > I found that System.currentTimeMillis() can be used here instead of new > Date.getTime(). > Since new Date() is a thin wrapper of light method > System.currentTimeMillis(). The performance will be greatly damaged if it is > invoked too much times. > According to my local testing at the same environment, > System.currentTimeMillis() can achieve a speedup to 5 times (435 ms vs 2073 > ms), when these two methods are invoked 5,000,000 times. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)