[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-28952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18014086#comment-18014086
]
Neeraj Khatri edited comment on HIVE-28952 at 8/16/25 4:57 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
[~dkuzmenko] I have explained the optimization on the PR itself.
And as for the point of getting table objects directly, in my earlier
implementation, I had implemented a new HMS API endpoint like
*listTableNamesByFilter* that was marked as unnecessary by [~vikramahuja] and
was suggested to change my implementation to use the getTableNames one and not
add a newer HMS API endpoint
was (Author: JIRAUSER310068):
[~dkuzmenko] I have explained the optimization on the PR itself.
And as for the point of getting table objects directly, in my earlier
implementation, I had implemented a new HMS API endpoint like
```listTableNamesByFilter``` that was marked as unnecessary by [~vikramahuja]
and was suggested to change my implementation to use the getTableNames one and
not add a newer HMS API endpoint
> TableFetcher to return Table objects instead of names
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-28952
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-28952
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: László Bodor
> Assignee: Neeraj Khatri
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>
> follow-up on HIVE-28930
> {code}
> // TODO: Future improvement – modify TableFetcher to return HMS Table
> API objects directly,
> // avoiding the need for subsequent msc.getTable calls to fetch each
> matched table individually
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
