[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-29153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

yongzhi.shao updated HIVE-29153:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
{code:java}
if (!groupingSets.isEmpty() && groupByExprs.size() > Long.SIZE) {
  throw new SemanticException(ErrorMsg.HIVE_GROUPING_SETS_SIZE_LIMIT.getMsg());
} 
//  Long.SIZE = 64{code}
Currently, we find that our users are starting to use 100~200 groupByExprs, is 
the current maximum limit of 64 too small?

  was:
{code:java}
if (!groupingSets.isEmpty() && groupByExprs.size() > Long.SIZE) {
  throw new SemanticException(ErrorMsg.HIVE_GROUPING_SETS_SIZE_LIMIT.getMsg());
} 
//  Long.SIZE = 64{code}
目前,我们发现,我们的用户开始使用100~200个groupByExprs,目前的最大限制64是否过于小了?


> HIVE_GROUPING_SETS_SIZE_LIMIT  too small
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-29153
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-29153
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: yongzhi.shao
>            Priority: Major
>
> {code:java}
> if (!groupingSets.isEmpty() && groupByExprs.size() > Long.SIZE) {
>   throw new 
> SemanticException(ErrorMsg.HIVE_GROUPING_SETS_SIZE_LIMIT.getMsg());
> } 
> //  Long.SIZE = 64{code}
> Currently, we find that our users are starting to use 100~200 groupByExprs, 
> is the current maximum limit of 64 too small?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to