[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aihua Xu updated HIVE-12222:
----------------------------
    Attachment: HIVE-12222.2.patch

Patch-2: added retry logic if the port is used and also changed to throw 
exception if the configuration is incorrect rather than silently uses 0, since 
I feel that that could confuse the users more. 

> Define port range in property for RPCServer
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-12222
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-12222
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: CLI, Spark
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.1
>         Environment: Apache Hadoop 2.7.0
> Apache Hive 1.2.1
> Apache Spark 1.5.1
>            Reporter: Andrew Lee
>            Assignee: Aihua Xu
>         Attachments: HIVE-12222.1.patch, HIVE-12222.2.patch
>
>
> Creating this JIRA after discussin with Xuefu on the dev mailing list. Would 
> need some help to review and update the fields in this JIRA ticket, thanks.
> I notice that in 
> ./spark-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hive/spark/client/rpc/RpcServer.java
> The port number is assigned with 0 which means it will be a random port every 
> time when the RPC Server is created to talk to Spark in the same session.
> Because of this, this is causing problems to configure firewall between the 
> HiveCLI RPC Server and Spark due to unpredictable port numbers here. In other 
> word, users need to open all hive ports range 
> from Data Node => HiveCLI (edge node).
> {code}
>  this.channel = new ServerBootstrap()
>       .group(group)
>       .channel(NioServerSocketChannel.class)
>       .childHandler(new ChannelInitializer<SocketChannel>() {
>           @Override
>           public void initChannel(SocketChannel ch) throws Exception {
>             SaslServerHandler saslHandler = new SaslServerHandler(config);
>             final Rpc newRpc = Rpc.createServer(saslHandler, config, ch, 
> group);
>             saslHandler.rpc = newRpc;
>             Runnable cancelTask = new Runnable() {
>                 @Override
>                 public void run() {
>                   LOG.warn("Timed out waiting for hello from client.");
>                   newRpc.close();
>                 }
>             };
>             saslHandler.cancelTask = group.schedule(cancelTask,
>                 RpcServer.this.config.getServerConnectTimeoutMs(),
>                 TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
>           }
>       })
> {code}
> 2 Main reasons.
> - Most users (what I see and encounter) use HiveCLI as a command line tool, 
> and in order to use that, they need to login to the edge node (via SSH). Now, 
> here comes the interesting part.
> Could be true or not, but this is what I observe and encounter from time to 
> time. Most users will abuse the resource on that edge node (increasing 
> HADOOP_HEAPSIZE, dumping output to local disk, running huge python workflow, 
> etc), this may cause the HS2 process to run into OOME, choke and die, etc. 
> various resource issues including others like login, etc.
> - Analyst connects to Hive via HS2 + ODBC. So HS2 needs to be highly 
> available. This makes sense to run it on the gateway node or a service node 
> and separated from the HiveCLI.
> The logs are located in different location, monitoring and auditing is easier 
> to run HS2 with a daemon user account, etc. so we don't want users to run 
> HiveCLI where HS2 is running.
> It's better to isolate the resource this way to avoid any memory, file 
> handlers, disk space, issues.
> From a security standpoint, 
> - Since users can login to edge node (via SSH), the security on the edge node 
> needs to be fortified and enhanced. Therefore, all the FW comes in and 
> auditing.
> - Regulation/compliance for auditing is another requirement to monitor all 
> traffic, specifying ports and locking down the ports makes it easier since we 
> can focus
> on a range to monitor and audit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to