[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15995121#comment-15995121
]
Sergio Peña commented on HIVE-16469:
------------------------------------
[~Ferd] Do you still remember hive/parquet? Would you help [~zsombor.klara]
having a second pair of eyes to review his code?
> Parquet timestamp table property is not always taken into account
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-16469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16469
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Barna Zsombor Klara
> Assignee: Barna Zsombor Klara
> Attachments: HIVE-16469.01.patch, HIVE-16469.02.patch,
> HIVE-16469.03.patch, HIVE-16469.04.patch
>
>
> The parquet timestamp timezone property is currently copied over into the
> JobConf in the FetchOperator, but this may be too late for some execution
> paths.
> We should:
> 1 - copy the property over earlier
> 2 - set the default value on the JobConf if no property is set, and fail in
> the ParquetRecordReader if the property is missing from the JobConf
> We should add extra validations for the cases when:
> - the property was not set by accident on the JobConf (unexpected execution
> path)
> - an incorrect/invalid timezone id is being set on the table
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
