[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16022329#comment-16022329
 ] 

anishek edited comment on HIVE-16738 at 5/24/17 5:22 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------

[~mohitsabharwal], i am looking at use cases where we have two separate 
instances of HS2 running in different machines(say HS1 and HS2)  with both of 
them connecting to a common hive metastore and the clients re connecting to one 
of the hive server 2 machines randomly, 

client 1 connects to HS1
client 2 connects to hs2

threads on HS1 and HS2 should be able to get a lock on 
{{NOTIFICATION_TBL_LOCK}} at the same time => hence entering the critical 
section to update the notification Event which would read the notification 
sequence entry with primary key 1 in both cases and update to the same value 
for possibly two events ?


was (Author: anishek):
[~mohitsabharwal], i am looking at use cases where we have two separate 
instances of HS2 running in different machines(say HS1 and HS2)  with both of 
them connecting to a common hive metastore and the clients re connecting to one 
of the hive server 2 machines randomly, 

client 1 connects to HS1
client 2 connects to hs2

threads on HS1 and HS2 should be able to get a lock on {{NOTIFICATION_TBL_LOCK 
}} at the same time => hence entering the critical section to update the 
notification Event which would read the notification sequence entry with 
primary key 1 in both cases and update to the same value for possibly two 
events ?

> Notification ID generation in DBNotification might not be unique across HS2 
> instances.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-16738
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16738
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HiveServer2
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: anishek
>            Assignee: anishek
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Going to explain the problem in scope of "replication" feature for hive 2 
> that is being built, as it is easier to explain:
> To allow replication to work we need to set 
> "hive.metastore.transactional.event.listeners"  to DBNotificationListener. 
> For use cases where there are multiple HiveServer2 Instances running 
> {code}
>  private void process(NotificationEvent event, ListenerEvent listenerEvent) 
> throws MetaException {
>     event.setMessageFormat(msgFactory.getMessageFormat());
>     synchronized (NOTIFICATION_TBL_LOCK) {
>       LOG.debug("DbNotificationListener: Processing : {}:{}", 
> event.getEventId(),
>           event.getMessage());
>       HMSHandler.getMSForConf(hiveConf).addNotificationEvent(event);
>     }
>       // Set the DB_NOTIFICATION_EVENT_ID for future reference by other 
> listeners.
>       if (event.isSetEventId()) {
>         listenerEvent.putParameter(
>             MetaStoreEventListenerConstants.DB_NOTIFICATION_EVENT_ID_KEY_NAME,
>             Long.toString(event.getEventId()));
>       }
>   }
> {code}
> the above code in DBNotificationListner having the object lock wont be 
> guarantee enough to make sure that all events get a unique id. The 
> transaction isolation level at the db "read-comitted" or "repeatable-read"  
> would  also not guarantee the same, unless a lock is at the db level 
> preferably on table {{NOTIFICATION_SEQUENCE}} which only has one row.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to