[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-18153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16288744#comment-16288744
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-18153:
--------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Findbugs executables are not available. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} master Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  7m 
13s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m  
5s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
38s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
57s{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  1m 
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  1m  
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  1m  
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red}  0m 
38s{color} | {color:red} ql: The patch generated 37 new + 480 unchanged - 35 
fixed = 517 total (was 515) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
12s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 14m 26s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  findbugs  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux hiveptest-server-upstream 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 
3.16.36-1+deb8u1 (2016-09-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /data/hiveptest/working/yetus/dev-support/hive-personality.sh |
| git revision | master / 095e6bf |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_111 |
| checkstyle | 
http://104.198.109.242/logs//PreCommit-HIVE-Build-8207/yetus/diff-checkstyle-ql.txt
 |
| modules | C: ql U: ql |
| Console output | 
http://104.198.109.242/logs//PreCommit-HIVE-Build-8207/yetus.txt |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus    http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> refactor reopen and file management in TezTask
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-18153
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-18153
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
>         Attachments: HIVE-18153.01.patch, HIVE-18153.02.patch, 
> HIVE-18153.03.patch, HIVE-18153.04.patch, HIVE-18153.05.patch, 
> HIVE-18153.patch
>
>
> TezTask reopen relies on getting the same session object in terms of setup; 
> WM reopen returns a new session from the pool. 
> The former has the advantage of not having to reupload files and stuff... but 
> the object reuse results in a lot of ugly code, and also reopen might be 
> slower on average with the session pool than just getting a session from the 
> pool. Either WM needs to do the object-preserving reopen, or TezTask needs to 
> be refactored. It looks like DAG would have to be rebuilt to do the latter 
> because of some paths tied to a directory of the old session. Let me see if I 
> can get around that; if not we can do the former; and then if the former 
> results in too much ugly code in WM to account for object reuse for different 
> Tez client I'd do the latter anyway since it's a failure path :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to