[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16309171#comment-16309171
 ] 

Hive QA commented on HIVE-17486:
--------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red}  0m 11s{color} 
| {color:red} 
/data/hiveptest/logs/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-8411/patches/PreCommit-HIVE-Build-8411.patch
 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute for help. 
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Console output | 
http://104.198.109.242/logs//PreCommit-HIVE-Build-8411/yetus.txt |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus    http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Enable SharedWorkOptimizer in tez on HOS
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-17486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17486
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: liyunzhang
>            Assignee: liyunzhang
>         Attachments: HIVE-17486.1.patch, HIVE-17486.2.patch, 
> HIVE-17486.3.patch, HIVE-17486.4.patch, HIVE-17486.5.patch, 
> explain.28.share.false, explain.28.share.true, scanshare.after.svg, 
> scanshare.before.svg
>
>
> in HIVE-16602, Implement shared scans with Tez.
> Given a query plan, the goal is to identify scans on input tables that can be 
> merged so the data is read only once. Optimization will be carried out at the 
> physical level.  In Hive on Spark, it caches the result of spark work if the 
> spark work is used by more than 1 child spark work. After sharedWorkOptimizer 
> is enabled in physical plan in HoS, the identical table scans are merged to 1 
> table scan. This result of table scan will be used by more 1 child spark 
> work. Thus we need not do the same computation because of cache mechanism.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to