Xuanwo commented on PR #176: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/176#issuecomment-1970337631
> For here, I just find that this design can give users more power to custom and reuse something so I follow it. It's ok for me to modify it if there is a simpler design. Thank you for understanding. My personal approach is to develop a simple, functional API that meets the required features and then build upon it. Having a powerful API from the start makes me nervous. Adding things is easy, but removing them is much harder. Both designs should work well. Iceberg-rust is still in its `0.x` versions, allowing us to test and validate our design with real-world use cases. Perhaps ultimately, users don't care about this aspect at all. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
