RussellSpitzer commented on code in PR #10755:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10755#discussion_r1690422091


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/TableMetadata.java:
##########
@@ -1102,6 +1121,22 @@ public Builder setDefaultPartitionSpec(int specId) {
       return this;
     }
 
+    private Builder removePartitionSpec(PartitionSpec spec) {
+      Preconditions.checkArgument(
+          changes.isEmpty(), "Cannot remove partition spec with other metadata 
update");
+      Preconditions.checkArgument(
+          spec.specId() != defaultSpecId, "Cannot remove default partition 
spec");
+      PartitionSpec toBeRemoved = specsById.remove(spec.specId());
+      Preconditions.checkArgument(
+          toBeRemoved != null && toBeRemoved.equals(spec),
+          "Cannot remove an unknown spec, spec id: %s",
+          spec.specId());
+      this.specs =

Review Comment:
   Should we be validating that all the specs we are trying to remove exist? I 
think this may be fine, just thinking about commit conflicts



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to