kevinjqliu commented on issue #2064: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/2064#issuecomment-3042208906
> my understanding is that the iceberg reference jdbc implementation does not store table properties in a sql table. Any advice on how we can store properties in the catalog while maintaining compatibility? @Anton-Tarazi youre right, looks like the JDBC catalog implementation does not store table properties internally. In that case, we can skip the implementation for pyiceberg -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
