nt-tryg commented on issue #1487: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/1487#issuecomment-3077580983
> Look like none of identifier-field-ids and empty of identifier-field-ids can be consider as the same effect. And represent both of them as empty identifier-field-ids make we use them more eaiser.🤔 Ye can see that iceberg go has the same inconsistency compared the iceberg documentation, but would this not fail trying to parse a manifest with this field missing? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
