smaheshwar-pltr opened a new issue, #17995: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/17995
### Feature Request / Improvement Wary that 1.12 is coming up, and was auditing the state of encryption. I see https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17533 and https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17417 which are great. I'm not too opinionated here but I was wondering if we can temporarily throw on writing these files for encrypted tables - with those guards then simply being removed when the implementation lands? I'm not opinionated here - just wondering if being defensive here improves / hardens the Spark encryption integration. I've put up https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17994 and https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17993, as the small changes here if folks are on board, but if not, happy to close these all out. ### Query engine None ### Willingness to contribute - [x] I can contribute this improvement/feature independently - [ ] I would be willing to contribute this improvement/feature with guidance from the Iceberg community - [ ] I cannot contribute this improvement/feature at this time -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
