szehon-ho commented on a change in pull request #3273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3273#discussion_r732365632



##########
File path: 
spark/v3.0/spark3-extensions/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/extensions/TestAddFilesProcedure.java
##########
@@ -106,6 +119,68 @@ public void addDataUnpartitionedOrc() {
         sql("SELECT * FROM %s ORDER BY id", tableName));
   }
 
+  @Test
+  public void addAvroFile() throws Exception {
+    // Spark Session Catalog cannot load metadata tables
+    // with "The namespace in session catalog must have exactly one name part"
+    Assume.assumeFalse(catalogName.equals("spark_catalog"));
+
+    Schema schema = new Schema(
+        Types.NestedField.required(1, "id", Types.LongType.get()),
+        Types.NestedField.optional(2, "data", Types.StringType.get()));
+
+    GenericRecord baseRecord = GenericRecord.create(schema);
+
+    ImmutableList.Builder<Record> builder = ImmutableList.builder();
+    builder.add(baseRecord.copy(ImmutableMap.of("id", 1L, "data", "a")));
+    builder.add(baseRecord.copy(ImmutableMap.of("id", 2L, "data", "b")));
+    List<Record> records = builder.build();
+
+    OutputFile file = Files.localOutput(temp.newFile());
+
+    DataWriter<Record> dataWriter = Avro.writeData(file)
+        .schema(schema)
+        .createWriterFunc(org.apache.iceberg.data.avro.DataWriter::create)
+        .overwrite()
+        .withSpec(PartitionSpec.unpartitioned())
+        .build();
+
+    try {
+      for (Record record : records) {
+        dataWriter.add(record);
+      }
+    } finally {
+      dataWriter.close();
+    }
+
+    String path = dataWriter.toDataFile().path().toString();
+
+    String createIceberg =
+        "CREATE TABLE %s (id Long, data String) USING iceberg";
+    sql(createIceberg, tableName);
+
+    Object result = scalarSql("CALL %s.system.add_files('%s', '`avro`.`%s`')",
+        catalogName, tableName, path);

Review comment:
       Got it, was not familiar with this.  I changed to using native Avro 
writers, does that do the trick?
   
   Re: fieldId check, sounds good, probably we can look at that and also add 
general schema validation while importing the file.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to