dramaticlly commented on PR #6301: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6301#issuecomment-1329783777
> The only case where a field in a union result would not be optional is if both schemas have it as required, right? If that's the case (I think I kind of agree), looks like required new field cannot be added as required later in update-schema call given prior schema will always missing new filed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
