aokolnychyi commented on PR #6651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6651#issuecomment-1449274994
> To get this working in other situations, I think we should go back to the
original idea of using the branch name in the table identifier, like
catalog.db.table.branch. While that's not ideal for column references (by
default columns would be branch.col rather than table.col) it is the most
reliable solution for writes, reads, and dynamic pruning.
What about using the exact same syntax we support for reads? I believe it
would be `catalog.db.table.branch_{NAME}`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
