[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17183138#comment-17183138 ]
Vladislav Pyatkov commented on IGNITE-13265: -------------------------------------------- [~ascherbakov] I answered you in PR. More over I try to explain comments here: 1. It guarantees nothing, but makes a skip of record less probably during historical rebalance. 2. I think this behavior was applying earlier and goes out of scope this ticket. But if I correct realize you want to go through over whole WAL history, this cannot be more effective. > Historical iterator for atomic group should transfer few more rows than > required > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-13265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13265 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Vladislav Pyatkov > Assignee: Vladislav Pyatkov > Priority: Major > Time Spent: 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > On a historical rebalance some updates move from one node to another wherein > this update may have various order in nodes. Reordering can happen in smell > interval, but it cannot avoid at all in current implementation atomic > protocol. > This mean we will reduce a probably of loosing update if we make a margin > from initial counter for the historical iterator on atomic cache. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)