[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Pavel Tupitsyn reassigned IGNITE-14076: --------------------------------------- Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn > Exponential putAll performance degradation in transactional cache > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-14076 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14076 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Components: cache > Affects Versions: 2.9.1 > Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn > Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.11 > > > {{putAll}} execution time grows almost exponentially while the number of keys > grows linearly in the following test: > {code:java} > public class PutAllTxTest extends GridCommonAbstractTest { > @Test > public void testPutAll() throws Exception { > Ignition.start(getConfiguration("server1")); > Ignition.start(getConfiguration("server2")); > Ignite ignite = > Ignition.start(getConfiguration("client").setClientMode(true)); > IgniteCache<Integer, Integer> cache = ignite.createCache( > new CacheConfiguration<Integer, Integer>("c") > .setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL)); > int count = 50000; > Map<Integer, Integer> data = new TreeMap<>(); > for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) > data.put(i, i); > long begin = System.nanoTime(); > cache.putAll(data); > long dur = System.nanoTime() - begin; > System.out.println(">>>>> " + dur / 1000000); > } > } > {code} > ||Entries||Seconds|| > |1000|0.4| > |5000|1.9| > |10000|3.8| > |20000|10.7| > |30000|23.5| > |40000|41| > |50000|64| > |60000|90| > |100000|254| > This does not reproduce with 1 server node, and does not reproduce on > {{ATOMIC}} caches with any number of nodes. > *Investigation:* > - Not a GC issue (it barely runs) > - Not a memory issue (heap is under 1GB) > - GridDhtTxPrepareFuture#localDhtPendingVersions -> > GridCacheMapEntry.localCandidates is the bottleneck. For 1K keys, > localCandidates gets called 123K times, 2K keys - 484K times, etc. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)