[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15219779#comment-15219779
]
Igor Sapego edited comment on IGNITE-2920 at 3/31/16 11:59 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Vladimir,
The problem is that the signature of the {{std::exception::what()}} method has
changed in C\+\+11. Thus we Ignite will not be able to be compiled for modern
C\+\+ if we leave it as it is now.
As an alternative we can adjust signature of the {{IgniteError::what()}} with
macros so it will be valid for both C\+\+11 and C\+\+03.
What do you think?
was (Author: isapego):
Vladimir,
The problem is that the signature of the {{std::exception::what()}} method has
changed in C\+\+11. Thus we Ignite will not be able to be compiled for modern
C\+\+ if we leave it as it is now.
As an alternative we can adjust signature of the {{IgniteError::what()}} with
macros so it will be valid for both C\+\+11 and C++03.
What do you think?
> CPP: IgniteError should be derived from std::runtime_error not from
> std::exception
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-2920
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2920
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: platforms
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
> Reporter: Igor Sapego
> Assignee: Igor Sapego
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> It seems like std::exception is not supposed to be used as a base class by
> user classes. It is suggested to use std::runtime_error instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
