[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17420751#comment-17420751
]
Anton Vinogradov commented on IGNITE-15391:
-------------------------------------------
Merged to the master.
[~timonin.maksim], thanks for your contribution!
> IndexName parameter of IndexQuery should be optional
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-15391
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15391
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Maksim Timonin
> Assignee: Maksim Timonin
> Priority: Major
> Labels: IEP-71
> Fix For: 2.12
>
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> IndexQuery should be created by list of fields specified in criteria. Order
> of fields doesn't matter. Ignite should find best index by criteria fields,
> and fields has to match index prefix.
>
> I believe that it's a useful feature. My main argument is still the same:
> 1. Ignite provides to users the possibility to create an index without name
> setting. Then Ignite should provide the possibility to query them.
> 2. Naming of index isn't transparent, and hidden in internal packages. For
> example QuerySqlField provides opportunity to create an index, and set name
> to field (but not for index). But QuerySqlField.Group name set index name.
> This misleading.
> 3. There is an example of using such API in other databases: as Ivan
> mentioned, MongoDB doesn't require to specify an index name [1], it searches
> it by fields only. Note, MongoDB doesn't require strict fields order for
> querying indexes, but requires it for sorting [2].
>
> I don't see reasons not to provide a similar API for our users.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
