[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17570797#comment-17570797
]
Maksim Timonin edited comment on IGNITE-17272 at 7/25/22 9:33 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[~apolovtcev] [~ibessonov]
Hi guys! This fix isn't fully correct. It leads to the InvalidMarkException
while parsing encrypted records from WAL.
I found that while investigating a reason of test ([1]) started failing.
Actually there is a small fix [2], could you please have a look?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17215
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17408
was (Author: timonin.maksim):
[~apolovtcev] [~ibessonov]
Hi guys! This fix isn't fully correct. It leads to the InvalidMarkException
while parsing encrypted records from WAL.
I found that while investigating a reason of test ([1]) started failing.
Actually there is a small fix [2], could you please have a look? WDYT, should I
add more tests here?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17215
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17408
> Logical recovery works incorrectly for encrypted caches
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-17272
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17272
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cache
> Affects Versions: 2.13
> Reporter: Aleksandr Polovtcev
> Assignee: Aleksandr Polovtcev
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.14
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When encryption is enabled for a particular cache, its WAL records get
> encrypted and wrapped in an {{EncryptedRecord}}. This encrypted record type
> is considered a {{PHYSICAL}} record, which leads to such records being
> omitted during logical recovery regardless of the fact that it can contain
> logical records.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
