[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-20869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kirill Gusakov updated IGNITE-20869:
------------------------------------
Description:
[This
|https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/blob/82c74598b5006ea3e4e86da744a68022dd799c89/modules/network/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/network/DefaultMessagingService.java#L254-L255]line
of code cost us near the 3us from the 26us of the whole query (~10%). The
reason is the orTimeout(...) call.
The simple switch to simple new CompletableFuture() give us 10% boost from
26us/s to 23us/s in the 1-node fsync=false run of SelectBenchmark.kvGet.
was:
[This
|https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/blob/82c74598b5006ea3e4e86da744a68022dd799c89/modules/network/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/network/DefaultMessagingService.java#L254-L255]line
of code cost us near the 3us from the 26us of the whole query (~10%). The
reason is the orTimeout(...) call.
> CompletableFuture with orTimeout has noticeable performance impact
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-20869
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-20869
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Kirill Gusakov
> Priority: Major
>
> [This
> |https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/blob/82c74598b5006ea3e4e86da744a68022dd799c89/modules/network/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/network/DefaultMessagingService.java#L254-L255]line
> of code cost us near the 3us from the 26us of the whole query (~10%). The
> reason is the orTimeout(...) call.
> The simple switch to simple new CompletableFuture() give us 10% boost from
> 26us/s to 23us/s in the 1-node fsync=false run of SelectBenchmark.kvGet.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
