[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-21135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Maksim Timonin updated IGNITE-21135:
------------------------------------
    Description: 
`CdcManager` must guarantee that its method `#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` must 
finish before the first call of `#collect`.

But actually there is a contention between these methods. Scenario of the 
contention:

Ignite node starts, it restores binary memory in 
`GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager#restoreBinaryMemory`. In this method:
 # `FileWriteAheadLogManager` resumes logging and starts the 
`wal-segment-syncer` thread.
 # `MemoryRecoveryRecord` is written.
 # Callbacks `DatabaseLifecycleListener#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` are called.
 # Implementations of `CdcManager` must extend `DatabaseLifecycleListener`, 
then  `CdcManager#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` method is invoked.
 # Background `wal-segment-syncer` thread invokes `CdcManager#collect` method.
 # `CdcManager#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` finishes after that.

To fix this issue:
 # `CdcManager#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` must be invoked before writing the 
`MemoryRecoveryRecord`.
 # Then now `CdcManager` should not extend `DatabaseLifecycleListener`, and the 
`#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` method must be invoked directly on the `CdcManager` 
(see how it's done for in-memory caches in 
`IgniteCacheDatabaseSharedManager#startMemoryRestore).
 # The interface can be simplified, only WALPointer should be specified.

 

  was:
`CdcManager` must guarantee that `afterBinaryMemoryRestore()` finishes before 
the first call of `collect()`.

Scenario of the contention:
 # Ignite node starts, restores binary memory in 
GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager#restoreBinaryMemory.
 # FileWriteAheadLogManager resumes logging and starts the "wal-segment-syncer" 
thread.
 # MemoryRecoveryRecord is written
 # CdcManager#afterBinaryMemoryRestore method is invoked in the Ignite start 
thread.
 #  

 

Note, the `collect()` method is called from the background system thread 
`wal-segment-syncer`.

 

 

In `CdcManager` there is a contention between `collect()` and 
`afterBinaryMemoryRestore()` due to Ignite writes the `MemoryRecoveryRecord`.

afterBinaryMemoryRestore should be invoked BEFORE any collect().


> CdcManager might collect WAL data before restoring it's state
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-21135
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-21135
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Maksim Timonin
>            Assignee: Maksim Timonin
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.17
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> `CdcManager` must guarantee that its method `#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` must 
> finish before the first call of `#collect`.
> But actually there is a contention between these methods. Scenario of the 
> contention:
> Ignite node starts, it restores binary memory in 
> `GridCacheDatabaseSharedManager#restoreBinaryMemory`. In this method:
>  # `FileWriteAheadLogManager` resumes logging and starts the 
> `wal-segment-syncer` thread.
>  # `MemoryRecoveryRecord` is written.
>  # Callbacks `DatabaseLifecycleListener#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` are called.
>  # Implementations of `CdcManager` must extend `DatabaseLifecycleListener`, 
> then  `CdcManager#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` method is invoked.
>  # Background `wal-segment-syncer` thread invokes `CdcManager#collect` method.
>  # `CdcManager#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` finishes after that.
> To fix this issue:
>  # `CdcManager#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` must be invoked before writing the 
> `MemoryRecoveryRecord`.
>  # Then now `CdcManager` should not extend `DatabaseLifecycleListener`, and 
> the `#afterBinaryMemoryRestore` method must be invoked directly on the 
> `CdcManager` (see how it's done for in-memory caches in 
> `IgniteCacheDatabaseSharedManager#startMemoryRestore).
>  # The interface can be simplified, only WALPointer should be specified.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to