[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15373236#comment-15373236 ]
Anton Vinogradov edited comment on IGNITE-2079 at 7/12/16 5:04 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrey, 1) Did you check that original "Class can not be unmarshalled." are inside msg.classError()? 2) Each get should be cashed at local variable in case it used more than once, eg {{ctx.kernalContext(). ...}} 3) Please use {{GridTestUtils.waitForCondition -> unhandledExceptionCounter.get() == metr.executions() == metr.fails() == 1}} instead of {{unhandledExceptionDownLatch}} 4) Replace {{throw new IgniteException("This line newer calls");}} with fail(...). 5) Possible, we have to add put from another node and handle it {{jcache(1).put(testKey2, "value2");}} 6) Seems you duplicated line {{suite.addTestSuite(IgniteCacheContinuousQueryBackupQueueTest.class);}} 7) Use {{log}} already defined at {{GridAbstractTest}} instead of {{private GridStringLogger stringLogger = new GridStringLogger();}} was (Author: avinogradov): Andrey, 1) Did you check that original "Class can not be unmarshalled." are inside msg.classError()? 2) Each get should be cashed at local variable in case it used more than once, eg {{ctx.kernalContext(). ...}} 3) Please use {{GridTestUtils.waitForCondition -> unhandledExceptionCounter.get() == metr.executions() == metr.fails() == 1}} instead of {{unhandledExceptionDownLatch}} 4) Replace {{throw new IgniteException("This line newer calls");}} with fail(...). 5) Possible, we have to add put from another node and handle it {{jcache(1).put(testKey2, "value2");}} 6) Seems you duplicated line {{suite.addTestSuite(IgniteCacheContinuousQueryBackupQueueTest.class);}} > GridCacheIoManager eats exception trail if it falls into the directed case > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-2079 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2079 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Anton Vinogradov > Assignee: Andrey Velichko > Labels: ignite-3424 > Fix For: 1.7 > > Attachments: IgniteCacheP2pUnmarshallingContinuousQueryErrorTest.java > > > During a recent test I have run into an issue where a storage disabled client > of a Fabric that has services deployed for which the client does not have the > fabric in the class path failed with the following exception: > com.company.fabric.HelloWorldTest STANDARD_ERROR > Nov 08, 2015 6:15:20 PM org.apache.ignite.logger.java.JavaLogger error > SEVERE: Failed to process message > [senderId=30775397-457a-400f-a6c9-077c9e762d61, messageType=class > o.a.i.i.processors.cache.query.GridCacheQueryResponse] > class org.apache.ignite.IgniteCheckedException: Failed to send response to > node. Unsupported direct type [message=GridCacheQueryResponse [finished=true, > reqId=5, err=null, fields=false, metadata=null]] > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.processFailedMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:546) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.onMessage0(GridCacheIoManager.java:272) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager.access$700(GridCacheIoManager.java:77) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheIoManager$OrderedMessageListener.onMessage(GridCacheIoManager.java:1078) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$GridCommunicationMessageSet.unwind(GridIoManager.java:2302) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.unwindMessageSet(GridIoManager.java:992) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager.access$1700(GridIoManager.java:106) > at > org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.communication.GridIoManager$6.run(GridIoManager.java:961) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > This unfortunately gives me 0 information to work on to resolve the issue, as > the original unmarshalling exception (from the JdkMarshaller) was eaten as > this is the code for the default process failed message: > default: > throw new IgniteCheckedException("Failed to send response to node. > Unsupported direct type [message=" > + msg + "]"); > } > you should also include the original stack from msg.getError() in the newly > thrown IgniteCheckedException -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)