[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-26261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ilya Shishkov updated IGNITE-26261:
-----------------------------------
    Summary: Key class change leads to critical failures and B+Tree corruption  
(was: Key class change leads to critical failure and B+Tree corruption)

> Key class change leads to critical failures and B+Tree corruption
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-26261
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-26261
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.16
>            Reporter: Ilya Shishkov
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: ise
>
> It seems, than we have insufficient validation when inserting entries with 
> changed class of key to cache with indexing.
> When we try to put entry with new key class, there are some possible 
> scenarios:
> # Some data become unavailable with SQL.
> # Unexpected SQL requests failures.
> # Node failures.
> # B+Tree corruption. As I see, there are no possibility to rebuild indexes, 
> maintenance mode also fails to rebuild index. It is impossible to restore 
> data with standard utilities.
> Root cause for all cases:
> {code}
> org.apache.ignite.binary.BinaryObjectException: Failed to get field because 
> type ID of passed object differs from type ID this BinaryField belongs to 
> [expected=[typeId=449234053, 
> typeName=org.apache.ignite.KeyClassChangeTest$OtherIntKey], 
> actual=[typeId=1318599563, 
> typeName=org.apache.ignite.KeyClassChangeTest$IntKey], fieldId=106079, 
> fieldName=key, fieldType=int]
> {code}
> Problem is reproduced on Calcite and H2 engines.
> How to reproduce:
> # Create cache with query entity, where key class contains field, annotated 
> both {{@AffinityKeyMapped}} and {{@QuerySqlField}} annotations. To 
> B+Corruption it is not necessary to annotate field {{@AffinityKeyMapped}}, it 
> is reproduced with annotation {{@QuerySqlField(index = true)}} .
> # Insert some entries.
> # Create new key class with the same field: same name, same annotations.
> # If try to insert some entries with new key from primary, then you will get 
> {{CacheException}}. But entry will be inserted! Entry can not be obtained 
> from SQL.
> # If try to insert some entries with new key from *backup*, then all other 
> nodes, mapped to the key, will fail.
> # If you deactivate and restart cluster, and try to put few entries, then no 
> exception occur at all. Then you can not call such queries, as {{select * 
> from table}} (it seems, that problem will occur, when both keys conforms 
> query conditions). It does not matter, entries were put from primary or from 
> backup.
> # If you try to put relatively large amount of entries, then you will get 
> B+Tree corruption, which will not be fixed during maintenance mode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to