[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15565753#comment-15565753 ]
Pavel Tupitsyn edited comment on IGNITE-1915 at 10/11/16 4:34 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1,2) Reverted (temp code) 3) Fixed 4) This does not make sense to me. Do you mean that {code}if (get() == null) then putIfAbsent(){code} is faster than plain {code}putIfAbsent(){code}? I expect putIfAbsent to be as efficient as possible by itself. 5,6) Done was (Author: ptupitsyn): 1,2) Reverted (temp code) 3) Fixed 4) This does not make sense to me. Do you mean that {code}if (get() == null) then putIfAbsent(){code} is faster than plain {code}putIfAbsent(){code}? I expect putIfAbsent to be as efficient as possible by itself. 5) Done > .NET: Ignite as Entity Framework Second-Level Cache > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IGNITE-1915 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1915 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: platforms > Affects Versions: 1.1.4 > Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn > Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn > Labels: .net, roadmap > Fix For: 1.8 > > > Entity Framework is #1 ORM for .NET > We should provide easy solution to boost Entity Framework performance with > Ignite. > EF5 and EF6 have different 2nd level cache mechanisms (EF5 has a built-in > one, EF6 requies more customization or a 3rd party lib like > https://efcache.codeplex.com/). For now, let's do EF6 only. > This should be in a separate assembly and a separate NuGet package. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)