[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15690108#comment-15690108 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-3640: ---------------------------------------- GitHub user tledkov-gridgain opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1268 IGNITE-3640 IGFS: Local secondary: Investigate whether we need BufferedInputStream for open operation. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-3640 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1268.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1268 ---- commit 7d1e4fb00c5488559d894abe7405003f3562fe92 Author: tledkov-gridgain <tled...@gridgain.com> Date: 2016-11-23T13:28:37Z IGNITE-3640: remove buffer at input stream ---- > IGFS: Local secondary: Investigate whether we need BufferedInputStream for > open operation. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IGNITE-3640 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3640 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task > Components: IGFS > Affects Versions: 1.6 > Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov > Assignee: Taras Ledkov > Fix For: 2.0 > > > We need to accurately investigate IGFS input stream workflow. I have doubts > we really need to extend from {{BufferedInputStream}} here. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)